Interesting observation. Did you graph the M&Ms to see if their sizes were normally distributed? This also raises the question of whether M&M minis and chocolate bars are the result of natural variance in the M&M population, or forced selection.
Interestingly enough, the variation in size and shape is specific to the crispy variety of M&Ms. Normal M&Ms are much more uniform. Peanut M&Ms are a bit variable but crispy ones are usually lumpy, different sized, and blocthy in coat color. Minis are also quite uniform. I've spoken to M&M reps and they have said that they are DNA-free so I assume no selection occurs (lie).
3 Comments:
Interesting observation. Did you graph the M&Ms to see if their sizes were normally distributed? This also raises the question of whether M&M minis and chocolate bars are the result of natural variance in the M&M population, or forced selection.
Good luck with the defense.
Interestingly enough, the variation in size and shape is specific to the crispy variety of M&Ms. Normal M&Ms are much more uniform. Peanut M&Ms are a bit variable but crispy ones are usually lumpy, different sized, and blocthy in coat color. Minis are also quite uniform. I've spoken to M&M reps and they have said that they are DNA-free so I assume no selection occurs (lie).
Wonderful and informative web site.I used information from that site its great.
side steps 1997 dodge dakota bingo refinance in california cabo mortgage refinancing43 ford hot tennis player tv shows about hauntings bingo toshiba laptop espn table tennis domaine de la loi texas holdem
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home